Monday, September 9, 2013

Artists as Eternal Travelers

Les Waters, Madeleine Burnside & Bruce Simpson.

By Kathi E. B. Ellis, special thanks to Todd Zeigler
Text copyright © 2013 by Kathi E. B. Ellis. All rights reserved.

Photos by Becky LeCron, Copyright © 2013 LeCron Photography.

Earlier this summer Arts-Louisville writer Kathi E.B. Ellis sat down for a conversation with the leaders of three major Louisville arts institutions:  Madeleine Burnside, Executive Director of the Frazier History Museum; Bruce Simpson, Artistic Director of the Louisville Ballet; and Les Waters, Artistic Director of Actors Theatre of Louisville.
Each of these arts leaders has lived many places before he or she landed in Louisville – Bruce twelve years ago, Madeleine six years ago, and Les one year ago – bringing with them diverse and eclectic experiences within their individual art forms. 
Of approximately the same generation, each of them left their native British Isles for similar reasons – they could not begin, or continue, their work there because of geography, because of opportunity, because of their relationship to British society in the late '60s and early '70s. Bruce acknowledges a resentment of having lived in so many countries, of cultures that he’s had to absorb; and yet he now realizes it’s “an actual fact in this kind of situation: it's our biggest asset. Because, like a tourist, you have to look at 30,000 feet…you are looking from 30,000 at the community, where we are geographically, historically, socially. And at the same time we have to pay attention to the detail of Louisville.” And coming from a different culture, these artists bring a different set of expectations to the community. Les shared an anecdote when he was “complaining bitterly about something that really and truly, someone was being incredibly, not physically lazy, but incredibly mentally lazy. And I was saying 'You really have to change and upgrade this to a different way of thinking.' And they said, ‘Oh, but it's okay for Louisville.’" There was immediate and comprehensive rejection of that point of view from everyone at the table, and a consensus that while there is a conservative element here towards what is "art," there is also that "Keep Louisville Weird" vibe which brings a freedom and expansiveness to living and working in a city that doesn’t have everything figured out. Madeleine reflected that it’s actually a more healthy attitude than knowing everything. “I mean, when I grew up in London, it thought I knew what it was. You go back today and it's totally, totally different. So evidently, despite knowing what you are, change is going to occur. So just get into it and realize it's an ongoing process.”
None of them came straight to Louisville, but all agreed that “it was the job” that brought them here. Madeleine had interviews at two museums. “I didn't have any plans to move here. I was interviewing for the job thinking that I was actually going to take a different job, but this would be worth looking at because someone I respected a lot had told me to take a look. And then when I walked in the door, I fell in love with the museum.” Les concurred, “It was the job. I mean…my career has mainly been in the producing and directing of new work. So when I lived in England and was working at The Royal Court, I knew about the Humana Festival [of New American Plays], and [Michael] Billington from The Guardian would go and review it and the theatre that I worked in had a long tradition of working with American writers… So I had a knowledge of it.” Bruce “totally agree[s] with that … it was the job… I had heard about the Louisville Ballet when I was working in Japan and South Africa. But mostly because of the influence of the British Commonwealth. I didn't have much American influence in my career...and to know that the tradition Alan [Jones] and Helen [Starr] established here over a 25-year period was not just a great classical base but the opportunity [to] do really avant-garde work, I can take artistic risk within a very tight and disciplined classical framework.” Earlier in his career Bruce had met Thompson Smillie, who would later lead the Kentucky Opera, while Bruce was working as an extra for the Scottish Opera, little imagining that both would eventually lead two of Louisville’s major arts institutions.
Madeleine Burnside.
Something each brings to "the job" is a capacity to re-vision an existing institution. For Madeleine, working at an institution whose core collection is one that explores more than a thousand years of history through the lens of the Royal Armoury’s holdings (the only U.S. site for these artifacts), the challenge is how to make what is, to Americans, arcane history accessible. When she came to the museum, she says that it felt like a school text book on the wall, and a British text book, not an American one. “I knew, as an Englishperson, I could persuade the Armory in a way that an American couldn't.” As an Englishperson, her learning curve was American history; but the American learning curve is that they don’t know English history. Madeleine was in a unique position to bridge this gap and bring an insider/outsider perspective to re-creating how the Frazier would tell its story. Of course, she also faced a degree of institutional inertia, and during her first year, “someone actually said ‘we’ve always done it that way’ to me. And I said, 'Oh for God’s sake, it's three years old. There is no always.'" Part of that mantra is the undeniable fact that today’s audiences don’t return to museums just to see the permanent collection. As she says, there’s a reason that the Met programs visiting exhibitions – as does the Frazier, for example this past year’s "Spirits of the Passage" temporary exhibit spearheaded by the Frazier together with national and local partners.
Bruce’s programming lives in a world that can directly trace its antecedents to King Louis XIV in an almost direct and personal connection, choreographer to dancer, dancer to dancer; and yet for a ballet company to stay relevant today, “we have to have a company that reflects the dancers and the company have to reflect the community that we're living in and the repertoire has to reflect the community we're living in.” And for Bruce that includes having to “access a world that is not my birthright,” working at companies around the world with a corps of international dancers. In the twelve years he has been at the Louisville Ballet, Bruce has programmed the "war horse" ballets like Swan Lake and Giselle, as well as works by newer choreographers such as Val Caniparoli and Marc Hoagland, both featured in the upcoming season. He has also nurtured homegrown choreographic talents from within the company – ensuring that his art form’s direct line will continue and flourish out of Louisville.
Les Waters & Bruce Simpson.
Les brings to Actors Theatre of Louisville a career of producing and directing new works both in England and in the U.S. Early on in this country he worked for Joe Papp at the Public Theatre. Back in England, he began his career at the Royal Court Theatre, which declared itself a writers’ theatre in its first year of operation. Thus Les had a familiarity with American writers and with ATL: “…The theatre had a high reputation, you know, I mean it seemed like a fit. I mean there are other regional theaters that I don't think I'd be such a fit in.” As a working director, he says, he was at the stage of wondering, "What if the next boat is the boat that's gonna shake me up?...What is it that would be the spark that moves me forward?” From Girlfriend to The Mountaintop and to future Humana offerings, Louisville is in the process of embarking on that journey with Les.
Being of a similar generation, these three artists, from very different backgrounds, nevertheless articulated passionate reasons for leaving England that express a common theme. “I left England when Maggie Thatcher became Minister of Education,” says Madeleine. “And you just knew it was going downhill because the first thing she said was ‘I'm going to cut the grants."…It was the '60s. I had huge, huge resentment for the system and went to California and got to actual march against the Vietnam War.... I just thought I had more of a voice here. It was a more interesting place. England wasn't very interesting.” Les agrees. “I feel like this big here (holds out his arms) and I think in England, whenever I return…and I'm frightened of it in a sense, I feel like this big (measuring a space with his fingers), whether that's true or an imaginary thing.” Bruce states that he had to leave Scotland if he wanted to become a dancer, “But I was certainly resentful for most of my life actually, because I was forced to leave Scotland at 18 because there was no Scottish ballet company. So I resented being the eternal tourist.” He continues, “In my mid-30s, I had a conversation with my mother about [returning to Scotland to work]…. I was seriously puzzled about why I couldn't say "Yes."  She said, 'You're so full of resentment about what Scotland did to you when you were a teenager.' And she was absolutely right. Yet, I came to American in 2002 for the specific reason that I could have gone back to Britain and been really comfortable at the age of 50 in my culture. You know. I could have driven on the left hand side of the road, I wouldn't have to worry about a dialect or a 'Glaswegian' accent or anything like that. But the thing is, that would have been so boring and comfortable. I really wanted to use my life skills to get my butt kicked culturally, and certainly America can do that.”
Having three British ex-pats at the helm of a cultural institution in Louisville is not new. Bruce’s immediate predecessors at the Louisville Ballet were Welshman Alun Jones and Englishwoman Helen Starr; Thompson Smillie, a Scot, led the Kentucky Opera for many years; and Trish Pugh-Jones was a former Associate Director of Actors Theatre of Louisville with Jon Jory. Ms. Pugh-Jones has returned to her native Wales, but these other eternal tourists remain in the Louisville community. It’s the job that brought everyone of them here, and it’s something quintessentially American that keeps these three here. Finishing each other sentences, they all agree: “[It’s] like [America’s] being made up. It's got really great traditions and inside of that it's being made up…. It's that whole thing of the optimism and about getting things done. We don't know how to do it, but let's just do it. It's very attractive, for an artist.” And in summing up, almost in unison, “It’s the best.”
However long Madeleine, Bruce and Les make their life and work in Louisville, the community will benefit, as it has in previous generations, from these artists as eternal tourists who bring their cumulative cultural and artistic experiences into Louisville, demonstrating in each of their institutions one other belief on which they all agreed, as Bruce puts it, “...To the end of this day, especially in the arts, the absolute one thing that is completely essential is courage.”

Louisville Ballet presents Swan Lake                                                                  
September 13 & 14 @ 8 p.m.
September 14 @ 2 p.m.
Kentucky Center 
501 W. Main Street
502-584-7777
www.louisvilleballet.org


Noises Off runs through September 22 at Actors Theatre
316 W. Main Street
502-584-1205
www.actorstheatre.org


Mythic Creatures runs through September 13 at Frazier History Museum
829 W. Main Street
502-753-5663                                                                                         

www.fraziermuseum.org

Sunday, September 8, 2013

The Stranger and Ludlow Quinn, Chapter Four: Trickster, Sorcerer, Oracle, Sage


Leah Michelle Roberts is Millie in The Stranger and Ludlow Quinn.
Photo – Theatre [502].

Written by Diana Grisanti and Steve Moulds
Directed by Amy Attaway
Review by Keith Waits

Entire contents copyright 2013 by Keith Waits, all rights reserved.

One third of the way though, a viewer might begin to ponder when fatigue or redundancy might find its way into the 12 chapters of The Stranger and Ludlow Quinn. Chapter four moves us forward with equal parts invention and dramatic substance as the balloon is kept well in the air.

When last we saw Bonnie Burke (Becca Willenbrink), she and her new friend, Jill Dempkins (Alexandra Sweatt), had taken the magic book, written many years before by Ludlow Quinn, to Murray (Douglas Scot Sorenson), whose knowledge of magic clearly extends beyond hucksterism and the $5 novelties sold in his shop. Now retreated to his back room, they begin to explore the book's contents in earnest while the text is dramatized, in part, by scenes of Ludlow (Eli Keel) and the mysterious stranger, here confirmed to be Bonnie's grandmother, Millie (Leah Michelle Roberts).

The authors forego any formal synopsis or clever devices such as the filmed segments used in the last two chapters, instead folding some refresher into the text, as we discover more about Ludow and Millie's relationship while being reminded of how it was established in chapter one. It is a tidy way to bring in newcomers while nudging the action just a little further. Ludlow Quinn's return is welcome, as I had feared we would lose sight of him as the story remained in the present-day; but authors Diana Grisanti and Steve Moulds are allowing enough fluidity in their narrative structure to move in any direction they choose without seeming too random or arbitrary. For now, these middle chapters seem occupied by a desire for less less action and more depth for story and character.

So to answer the question, there is redundancy, yes, mostly owing to the creative team's unique responsibility to the audience in this format to somehow bring you up-to-date, but no signs of fatigue. The energy of the playing helps matters, as the ensemble of recurring players seem to relish the chance to return once a month to make their own discoveries about what happens next in the mercurial tale of Ludlow, Millie, Bonnie and the rest.

New chapters are scheduled to arrive on First Fridays each month through April 2014 performed at 7 p.m., 8 p.m., 9 p.m. and 10 p.m. Admission is free, but donations are welcome.

The Stranger and Ludlow Quinn, Chapter Four: Trickster, Sorcerer, Oracle, Sage
September 6, 2013
Theatre [502]
at The Baron's Theatre
131 West Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202                                                                                         



Friday, September 6, 2013

Actors Theatre Opens 50th Anniversary Season with “Noises Off”


Laura Jordan, Corey Brill, Rebecca Gibel,and Brad Heberlee in Noises Off 
at Actors Theatre of Louisville. Photo by Bill Brymer.


Noises Off

By Michael Frayn
Directed by Meredith McDonough
 
Review by Keith Waits

Copyright 2013 by Keith Waits, all rights reserved.

In the curtain speech delivered with Managing Director Jennifer Bielstein, Artistic Director Les Waters described Noises Off as “a gift” offered to audiences as the opening salvo in a celebratory 50th Anniversary season. A raucous, crowd-pleasing backstage farce satirizing theatrical archetypes, the choice is clearly designed to start this milestone season off with a bang: a safe but satisfying pick.

The script is an immaculately designed construction demanding razor-sharp timing for its utmost impact. It follows the first act of a production of a new play called Nothing On: first in dress rehearsal during the first act, where we view the action from the vantage point of the audience and the eccentricities and ineptitude of the cast are introduced; then a month into the tour, but this time the set has turned so that we are backstage for the hijinks that result when the petty jealousies and rivalries are spilling out in sometimes violent fashion; and then, finally, a third act that is the very last performance – a calamitous affair that betrays the deterioration of skill and artistry, if not the dogged professionalism that is the survival lifeline for all involved..

Director Meredith McDonough has cast the play faultlessly, with an ensemble that seems comfortable with the interplay of verbal and physical humor the script requires; and the audience in attendance with this reviewer received the performance with grateful enthusiasm. Yet it must be said that Noises Off is not all that it could be. The production earns its laughs through hard work and skill, but there were several moments when the seams showed. The daring second act turns into a near-silent pantomime of epic slapstick as cast members engage in near-combat with an axe that is exchanged so often it becomes nearly impossible to keep track. The sequence ranks as one of the most complex pieces of scripted physical comedy ever imagined, and it is well-choreographed here by Fight Director Drew Fracher. Yet it never achieves the giddy danger that it demands, with action that retains the element of caution of a late rehearsal. Other bits of business, such as a climactic fall down the stairs, also display the careful set-up and movement cues that ensure the actors safety. The fall earned an appreciative round of applause when it ought to have provoked gasps of astonishment.

Which is to say the whole enterprise is just shy of being fully realized. So much hard work is evident, and all of it on the right track, that it pains one to realize it, and another week in performance may be just the remedy. But this Noises Off wasn’t quite there yet.

Still, there are pleasures to savor, particularly among the cast. Corey Brill masterfully captured the bluster of the leading man, Garry Lejeune, who blithely refuses to finish any sentence in satisfactory fashion. Jeremy Lawrence delightfully stole most of his scenes as the drunken bit player Selsdon Mowbray; while Nathan Keepers was an individual presence as the assistant stage manager/understudy, and dexterously managed a nice bit of business erasing the intended second intermission while the turntable stage changed the scene. Dori Legg was also an added treat as Dotty Otley, a character whose name tells all; and not one of the players seemed to take a wrong step in their choices.

The set for Noises Off is usually a point of discussion, since it must be built to rotate between each act, and Daniel Zimmerman delivers the goods. Filled with details that reflect the mismatched elements of haphazard design one might expect in such a shaky theatrical offering, it is as important as any character. Kristopher Castle’s costumes were unfussy in evoking character and period without ostentation, and the quality of lighting and sound design were exemplary.

If this production just misses greatness, perhaps we can settle for a solid comedy that leaves us feeling happy to have spent another evening in the theatre. A Noises Off that is functioning at 95 percent capacity may still be more entertaining than lesser plays. It also proves the critics lament that shows tend to grow and achieve more as they are performed, but the reviews must, by necessity, come at the beginning of a run, not the end, when perhaps that greatness may have come to be realized. This production still has a chance to get where it strives to be.

Noises Off

September 3 – 22, 2013

Actors Theatre of Louisville
Pamela Brown Auditorium
316 West Main Street
Louisville, KY 40202
(502) 584-1205

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Kinsey Millhone Returns in Louisville Native Sue Grafton's "W is for Wasted"



W is for Wasted
By Sue Grafton
Published by G.P. Putnam's Sons
496 pages
$28.95 (hardcover)


Author Sue Grafton. Photo – Penquin Publishing.
By Keith Waits

Entire contents copyright 2013 by Keith Waits, all rights reserved.

If one scans the history of detective literature, it is tricky business to find a series following one character that has maintained as high a standard of quality as the Kinsey Millhone alphabet series. Indeed, only a few can boast as many titles in the first place. Robert Parker's Spenser novels (Kinsey's preferred nighttime reading in this new offering) number more than 30, yet even that most popular and venerable of series suffered a variance in quality noted by critic and reader alike. On the eve of the publication of the twenty-third entry, with only three more letters available, it is tempting to examine the newest volume all the harder for signs of fatigue and repetitiveness.

Author Sue Grafton's strengths remain well in attendance, namely an emphasis on characterization and resistance to violence and the action clichés of the genre. Kinsey is a work-a-day private investigator, and tension is developed in strained exchanges of dialogue more often than physical intimidation. As a writer, Grafton indulges in the mundane details of our hero making coffee, eating peanut butter and pickle sandwiches, and cleaning her apartment. But when the occasional bit of action does occur, her descriptive prose turns as lean and economical as the best of her peers.

If Ms. Grafton does grow weary following Kinsey's adventures, she seems to have found a way to energize her writing by altering the linear narrative structure and has, in the second half of the alphabet, grown fond of flashbacks appearing in alternate chapters. In the past, she has jumped back as far as 30 years; in "W" she settles for a point in time beginning four months before the primary narrative, and the scenario involves another private eye, Pete Wolinsky. His scurrilous and disreputable methods are a direct contrast to our heroine's scrupulous integrity, and his connection to the events that occupy Kinsey's attention here only become entirely clear in the final chapters of the book.

What we do know is that he is dead. This is no spoiler; the knowledge is offered early on, before his first flashback appearance. He is one of two corpses demanding Kinsey's attention, the other being a homeless man who was carrying her address and phone number when his body is discovered. The why of this is the lion's share of the story here and leads us once more into Kinsey's fragmented family history, an evolving and absorbing map of dysfunctionality that has proven, again, during the latter half of the series, to be one of the most resonant ingredients in Grafton's writing. We may forget, over the course of so many mysteries to be solved, the details of who did what to whom and when among the bad guys. But we always remember Kinsey and the ad hoc surrogate family she has accumulated: Henry, her doting and endearing landlord; Rosie, the Hungarian proprietor of Kinsey's favorite hang-out and now married to William, Henry's brother. Not to mention police detective and former lover Cheney Phillips. Grafton even reintroduces Nevada P.I. Robert Dietz, one of the more memorable of Kinsey's romantic entanglements and a character that one suspects could stand at the center of his own series.

Kinsey's involvement with the homeless in Santa Theresa also highlights Grafton's sly subtext in exploring the lives of characters who are down and out in what was Ronald Reagan's America. Neither the author nor her alter ego are given to overt political statements; and at least one minor character is interjected to apparently dispense with the more obvious 30-second sound bite social observations, an attempt to convince us there is no hidden agenda. Yet this author's propensity for fleshing out characters with some depth and detail cannot help but expand our concept of homelessness and explode our prejudices against such folk. Substance abuse and recalcitrance are exemplified, but attention is also given to compassion and forgiveness.

One of the curious quirks of the series is that it all takes place in a span of a few years in the 1980s. While we have spent 30 years with Kinsey (A is for Alibi was published in 1983), she has barely aged. It is a testament to Grafton's sense of place that these stories easily occupy a world that is simultaneously specific and universal. The location is the fictional southern California city of Santa Theresa (re: Santa Barbera) and all exists within a shared imagination – built by the author but given wider life by the devoted readers.

W is for Wasted doesn't quite rank as the very best of the series (my own personal favorite remains C is for Corpse). It takes too long to start tying its mystery plot together and when it does, the details seem not quite important enough to fully register as meaningful in Kinsey's life. But Grafton is clearly exploring some fresh aspects of her creation's character and history that are important in other ways, and it is exactly that sort of investment in the ongoing development of our beloved heroine that keeps us coming back for more.

Sue Grafton will be at Carmichael's Bookstore September 12 at 5 p.m. to sign copies of W is for Wasted.

Carmichael's Bookstore
2720 Frankfort Avenue
Louisville, Kentucky 40205
502-896-6950

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Absurd but Absurdly Good Production of Ionesco Play from Savage Rose

Sabrina Spalding, Victoria Reibel and Tony Pike in The Bald Soprano.
Photo by Kelly Moore.


The Bald Soprano

Written by Eugene Ionesco
Translated, Adapted, and Directed by Tad Chitwood

Reviewed by Craig Nolan Highley

Entire contents are copyright © 2013, Craig Nolan Highley.  All rights reserved.

I can honestly say I have never been more bewildered and confused by a play that entertained me so much.

Don’t look for a lot in the way of meaning or themes or even common sense in Savage Rose’s new production of Ionesco’s absurdist classic. You won’t find any. What you will find is an hour of laugh-out-loud silliness performed by a uniformly excellent cast. Yes, I left scratching my head; but my sides were sore from the constant hilarity.

Written by Eugene Ionesco in the late 1940s and first performed in 1950, it was inspired by the playwright’s attempt to learn the English language. Its nominal storyline involves an increasingly bizarre dinner party hosted by the Galettes (Michael Roberts and Karina Strange) and attended by the Martinis (Tony Pike and Sabrina Spaulding). As they continue in their escalating meaningless banter, they are frequently interrupted by their maid Mary (Victoria Riebel) and her lover, the Fire Chief (Brian Hinds). The lunacy escalates as the voices get louder, culminating in what appears to be a complete nervous breakdown by the entire cast.

I have never read Ionesco’s original French play or any of its English translations. But from what I can tell, director Tad Chitwood’s new translation is quite faithful aside from a few four-letter words and modern references. The meaning of all this lunacy has been debated since it was written, and some interesting theories were presented by some of my fellow audience members. I rather think it was deliberately pointless. It isn’t called Theater of the Absurd for nothing!

Performances were top-notch all around, with special props to Tony Pike for maintaining his constant state of bewilderment, as if he is the only character who realizes strange things are going on around him. Michael Roberts is also quite funny, as his lunacy escalates right along with the plot. And Karina Strange never quite tops herself after her hilarious foreign-language curtain speech at the top of the show.

Tech aspects such as the set design, sound and lighting were on par with the performances. It continues to amaze me what great things can be done in that small space at the Bard’s Town.

This was a nice change of pace for the Savage Rose Classical Theater Company. Sadly, the show will have closed by the time this review posts (it ran eight performances over two evenings), but hopefully it found its audience. I for one would love to see some more examples of classic Absurdist plays performed locally. Rhinoceros, anyone?

The Bald Soprano
Featuring Brian Hinds, Tony Pike Victoria Riebel, Michael Roberts, Sabrina Spaulding and Karina Strange
August 30-31, 2013

Savage Rose Classical Theatre Company
At The Bard's Town Theatre
1801 Bardstown Road
Louisville, KY 40205
(502) 749-5275